District: Chenango Forks Central School District
Location: Binghamton, New York
Vehicles: 2014 – 2019 Blue Bird Propane Vision, Type C school buses (17)
Fueling: On-site propane autogas station
With statewide budget cuts looming, a New York school district combed its school district’s budget line by line to find ways to save.
By the Numbers
- 57 percent propane fueled fleet
- 17 propane buses
- Saving nearly 35 percent per propane gallon versus diesel
In 2011, Chenango Forks Central School District was faced with school budget cuts made across the state of New York. This spurred the district’s Board of Education to take a closer look at the district’s budget. They discovered that the annual cost for diesel fuel was alarmingly high, raising concern for a school district with three schools and 30 buses.
“With Chenango Forks Central School District’s budget being cut, it was time to thoroughly review our district’s costs line-by-line once again,” said Spyros Dimatos, school board president. “We couldn’t believe how high the annual budget line item was for diesel fuel. We needed a solution to reduce this cost. With research, we found relief with propane school buses.”
Saving on Fuel
Chenango Forks Central School District began its adoption of propane school buses in 2012. Their first few propane buses were purchased with a rebate from the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, and the state registered with the IRS to obtain alternative fuel tax credits. For the next six years, the school district purchased propane buses to replace diesel models. Its fleet now includes 17 Blue Bird Vision Propane school buses equipped with Ford engines and ROUSH CleanTech liquid propane fuel systems.
Chenango Forks Central School District’s savings come in the form of fuel costs. On average, propane autogas costs up to 50 percent less than diesel. In October 2018, the district paid $1.46 per gallon of propane compared with $2.16 for diesel. In addition, the district capitalizes on federal tax credits.
With propane autogas, no exhaust after-treatment or diesel emissions fluids are required like with diesel to meet today’s strict emissions regulations. Propane vehicles also don’t need particulate trap systems, turbochargers and intercoolers. Plus, propane uses less engine oil, For example, an oil change for a Blue Bird Vision Propane school bus uses 7 quarts compared with over 17 quarts for a typical diesel engine. However, since an independent contractor maintains the buses, the district doesn’t realize these savings.
Driving Performance and Feedback
Chenango Forks Central School District is located in a river valley and most of its buses have at least two routes with hills. “It’s imperative that our school buses maintain their power on hills. We weren’t willing to compromise performance. We’ve found that our propane buses have more power than diesel buses, giving our drivers confidence,” said Lloyd L. Peck, Ed.D., superintendent of schools. “In addition to the bus’s power, the drivers value the lower noise level, their quick start and warm up time in cold weather, and the fact that there are no unpleasant fumes.”
Propane buses have quieter engines. Vehicles fueled by propane autogas reduce noise levels by about 50 percent when compared to diesel, allowing drivers to focus more on the road ahead.
Due to the chemical properties of propane autogas, the propane buses warm up quicker and have had no cold start issues. These buses can start up in temperatures as low as -40 degrees Fahrenheit. “In January 2018, the diesel fuel in our last few diesel buses gelled,” said Bernie McDermott, transportation director. “But we were able to get our students to school without concern as we had propane buses that started right up.”
The district’s drivers received training from ROUSH CleanTech on how to operate the propane buses. The district also provides a propane autogas manual to all drivers, holds safety meetings as needed, and has existing drivers help train new drivers.
The drivers have expressed other differences, too. There is a short waiting time for the engine to start — typically 7 to 15 seconds, but may be up to 45 seconds depending on conditions such as engine off time. With liquid propane, once the ignition key is used, the liquid propane autogas system runs a fuel flush process, which takes longer than starting a conventionally fueled vehicle. And when the drivers fuel the propane buses, it is a different hookup that takes a bit longer.
Fueling with Propane
Propane autogas is part of a close-looped fueling system, meaning the propane is never exposed to air and won’t spill during refill the way that gasoline and diesel can. However, fueling was the biggest challenge that the district had to overcome. “Until recently, there were no public propane fueling stations in our area,” said McDermott. “The one that now exists is still too far away to be useful as it takes 4 gallons of propane to travel to and from the station.”
Chenango Forks Central School District initially installed a 1,000-gallon tank located onsite at its bus garage next to existing pump stations. The fueling was slow. After a couple years they switched to a provider that was more knowledgeable about fueling propane buses. They replaced the tank and made other changes that increased refill time to 12 gallons per minute.
Recently the district added another 1,000-gallon tank to their station. They also are transitioning to the quick connect nozzle (often referred to as a Staubli) to make fueling simpler and quicker.
Knowing the hurdles of fueling with propane, the district allows a neighboring district with one propane bus to use its facility. Now when they discuss propane buses with other school districts, both Peck and Dimatos suggest propane station infrastructure be a part of the research and planning from the beginning. ROUSH CleanTech has helped hundreds of its customers find and partner with local fuel suppliers.
The school district has been pleased with its cost-cutting propane school buses. “For Chenango Forks Central School District, our propane school buses have been all wins,” said Dimatos.
About Blue Bird Corporation:
Blue Bird (Nasdaq: BLBD) is the leading independent designer and manufacturer of school buses, with more than 550,000 buses sold since its formation in 1927 and approximately 180,000 buses in operation today. Blue Bird’s longevity and reputation in the school bus industry have made it an iconic American brand. Blue Bird distinguishes itself from its principal competitors by its singular focus on the design, engineering, manufacture and sale of school buses and related parts.
As the only manufacturer of chassis and body production specifically designed for school bus applications, Blue Bird is recognized as an industry leader for school bus innovation, safety, product quality/reliability/durability, operating costs and drivability. In addition, Blue Bird is the market leader in alternative fuel applications with its propane-powered, electric-powered and compressed natural gas-powered school buses.
Blue Bird manufactures school buses at two facilities in Fort Valley, Georgia. Its Micro Bird joint venture operates a manufacturing facility in Drummondville, Quebec, Canada. Service and after- 4 market parts are distributed from Blue Bird’s parts distribution center located in Delaware, Ohio. For more information on Blue Bird’s complete line of buses, visit www.blue-bird.com.
About ROUSH CleanTech:
ROUSH CleanTech, an industry leader of alternative fuel vehicle technology, is a division of Roush Enterprises based in Livonia, Michigan. ROUSH CleanTech designs, engineers, manufactures and installs propane autogas and electric fuel system technology for medium-duty Ford commercial vehicles and school buses, and compressed natural gas fuel systems for school buses.
As a Ford QVM-certified alternative fuel vehicle manufacturer, ROUSH CleanTech delivers economical, clean and domestically produced fueling options for fleets across North America. Learn more at ROUSHcleantech.com or by calling 800.59.ROUSH.